Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Matsumoto, Masaaki*; Miyano, Hiroshi*; Noguchi, Kazuhiko*; Muramatsu, Ken*; Narumiya, Yoshiyuki*; Takata, Takashi; Muta, Hitoshi*; Itoi, Tatsuya*; Matsunaga, Yoko*; Sugiyama, Kenichiro*
no journal, ,
In society, understanding of risk is various. We will show how to understand risk and describe how to face risks in the society. Individual risks are accepted by individuals, but it is necessary for society to construct a structure in society that allows risks to be tolerated by society. For that purpose, we also describe what social risk is and how society and individuals face social risks and how to choose risks to accept. We consider not only the concept of nuclear risk but also how nuclear risk should be accepted from the viewpoint of disaster prevention for the public.
Matsunaga, Yoko*; Miyano, Hiroshi*; Noguchi, Kazuhiko*; Muramatsu, Ken*; Narumiya, Yoshiyuki*; Takata, Takashi; Muta, Hitoshi*; Itoi, Tatsuya*; Matsumoto, Masaaki*; Sugiyama, Kenichiro*
no journal, ,
After Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident, it becomes more important risk communication with the public. In discussions with the public in nuclear safety, communication and discussions on risks that not only nuclear risks also social risks are important. Differences in viewpoints, understanding, and thought about risks become communication difficult. We need to discuss risks fairly, appropriately with the public and reduce total social risks.